CPA
Vision 2011 and Beyond: Focus on the Horizon, published by the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), states that emotional skills are extremely
important and interpersonal skills are crucial for success as professional
accountants. During the audit process, auditors may experience emotional
reactions, such as liking or disliking toward client personnel, or anxiety
about components of tasks. Auditors also may also experience different moods
while conducting audits. Research reveals that an important consequence of
auditors experiencing emotions and moods is that these reactions can influence
their decision making and audit judgments.
A recently-published research article summarizes the results
and practice implications associated with several studies in a stream of
research that has examined the role of emotions and moods in auditing. Research
illustrates that auditors can experience emotional reactions toward a client
(e.g., likability) or an element of a task environment (e.g., anxiety from
dealing with certain types of people or about being held accountable) or
general moods unrelated to the judgment context (e.g., bad mood related to the
weather), which can result in judgment errors.
The research summarized in this paper reveals the potential
for auditors’ judgments to be susceptible to emotional reactions toward client
personnel and components of a task, as well as general negative and positive
moods. Given the fact that auditors’ emotional reactions and moods are
pervasive in the audit environment, such effects appear to be somewhat
inevitable. There is a potential for these effects to have significant negative
consequences. Therefore, a critical first step is to make auditors aware of the
potential for emotions and moods to inadvertently impact their judgments, and
how the reactions could impact audit effectiveness and efficiency.
For more information, read the 17-page research paper “The Role of Auditors’
Emotions and Moods on Audit Judgment: A Research Summary with Suggested
Practice Implications” by Sudip Bhattacharjee (Virginia Tech) and Kimberly
K. Moreno (Northeastern University). A manuscript has been accepted for
publication in an American
Accounting Association (AAA) journal. This preliminary version of the
manuscript was posted in the interest of making the information available for
distribution and citation as quickly as possible following acceptance.
Monday, August 19, 2013
Friday, August 9, 2013
Applying IFRS - Online guidance and resource materials
The Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada (CPA Canada) maintain an IFRS web section to provide guidance and support for understanding and applying International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Whether applying an existing standard, searching for information on new standards, preparing financial statements or communicating with clients or lenders about IFRS, check out these free online resources. The Reporting Alerts series summarizes new and revised standards.
In addition, the Viewpoint series discusses circumstances unique to the mining and the oil and gas sectors. CPA Canada and the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada (PDAC) created the Mining Industry Task Force to share views on IFRS application issues of relevance to junior mining companies. CPA Canada, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) and the Explorers and Producers Association of Canada (EPAC) created the Oil and Gas Industry Task Force to share views on IFRS application issues of relevance to junior oil and gas companies. In addition, learn more about the importance of applying professional judgment when preparing or auditing IFRS-based financial reporting.
Monday, August 5, 2013
IASB Discussion Paper - A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
In July 2013, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)
issued a Discussion Paper called “A
Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting.” The Paper sets
out the principles underpinning the International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS). It provides stakeholders with an opportunity to shape the future of
financial reporting. The 239-page Discussion Paper, providing 26 questions for
respondents to consider, is available for public comment until January 14,
2014.
In 2011, the IASB carried out a public consultation on its agenda. Most respondents to that consultation identified the Conceptual Framework as a priority project for the IASB. Consequently, the IASB decided to restart its Conceptual Framework project, which had been suspended in 2010.
This Discussion Paper is the first step towards issuing a revised Conceptual Framework. It is designed to obtain initial views and comments on a number of matters, and focuses on areas that have caused the IASB problems in practice. Consequently, this Discussion Paper does not cover all the issues that the IASB would expect to cover in an Exposure Draft of the Conceptual Framework. The Discussion Paper sets out the IASB’s preliminary views on some of the topics discussed. However, the IASB has not reached preliminary views on all of the issues discussed in this Discussion Paper.
The Discussion Paper addresses the definitions of assets and liabilities, recognition and de-recognition, the distinction between equity and liabilities, measurement, presentation and disclosure, and other comprehensive income. For an overview, see the July 23, 2013 article “IASB seeks feedback on conceptual framework revision” in the Journal of Accountancy online.
In 2011, the IASB carried out a public consultation on its agenda. Most respondents to that consultation identified the Conceptual Framework as a priority project for the IASB. Consequently, the IASB decided to restart its Conceptual Framework project, which had been suspended in 2010.
This Discussion Paper is the first step towards issuing a revised Conceptual Framework. It is designed to obtain initial views and comments on a number of matters, and focuses on areas that have caused the IASB problems in practice. Consequently, this Discussion Paper does not cover all the issues that the IASB would expect to cover in an Exposure Draft of the Conceptual Framework. The Discussion Paper sets out the IASB’s preliminary views on some of the topics discussed. However, the IASB has not reached preliminary views on all of the issues discussed in this Discussion Paper.
The Discussion Paper addresses the definitions of assets and liabilities, recognition and de-recognition, the distinction between equity and liabilities, measurement, presentation and disclosure, and other comprehensive income. For an overview, see the July 23, 2013 article “IASB seeks feedback on conceptual framework revision” in the Journal of Accountancy online.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)