Monday, August 19, 2013

The Role of Auditors’ Emotions and Moods on Audit Judgment

CPA Vision 2011 and Beyond: Focus on the Horizon, published by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), states that emotional skills are extremely important and interpersonal skills are crucial for success as professional accountants. During the audit process, auditors may experience emotional reactions, such as liking or disliking toward client personnel, or anxiety about components of tasks. Auditors also may also experience different moods while conducting audits. Research reveals that an important consequence of auditors experiencing emotions and moods is that these reactions can influence their decision making and audit judgments.

A recently-published research article summarizes the results and practice implications associated with several studies in a stream of research that has examined the role of emotions and moods in auditing. Research illustrates that auditors can experience emotional reactions toward a client (e.g., likability) or an element of a task environment (e.g., anxiety from dealing with certain types of people or about being held accountable) or general moods unrelated to the judgment context (e.g., bad mood related to the weather), which can result in judgment errors.

The research summarized in this paper reveals the potential for auditors’ judgments to be susceptible to emotional reactions toward client personnel and components of a task, as well as general negative and positive moods. Given the fact that auditors’ emotional reactions and moods are pervasive in the audit environment, such effects appear to be somewhat inevitable. There is a potential for these effects to have significant negative consequences. Therefore, a critical first step is to make auditors aware of the potential for emotions and moods to inadvertently impact their judgments, and how the reactions could impact audit effectiveness and efficiency.

For more information, read the 17-page research paper “The Role of Auditors’ Emotions and Moods on Audit Judgment: A Research Summary with Suggested Practice Implications” by Sudip Bhattacharjee (Virginia Tech) and Kimberly K. Moreno (Northeastern University). A manuscript has been accepted for publication in an American Accounting Association (AAA) journal. This preliminary version of the manuscript was posted in the interest of making the information available for distribution and citation as quickly as possible following acceptance.

Friday, August 9, 2013

Applying IFRS - Online guidance and resource materials


The Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada (CPA Canada) maintain an IFRS web section to provide guidance and support for understanding and applying International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Whether applying an existing standard, searching for information on new standards, preparing financial statements or communicating with clients or lenders about IFRS, check out these free online resources. The Reporting Alerts series summarizes new and revised standards.

In addition, the Viewpoint series discusses circumstances unique to the mining and the oil and gas sectors. CPA Canada and the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada (PDAC) created the Mining Industry Task Force to share views on IFRS application issues of relevance to junior mining companies. CPA Canada, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) and the Explorers and Producers Association of Canada (EPAC) created the Oil and Gas Industry Task Force to share views on IFRS application issues of relevance to junior oil and gas companies. In addition, learn more about the importance of applying professional judgment when preparing or auditing IFRS-based financial reporting.

Monday, August 5, 2013

IASB Discussion Paper - A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

In July 2013, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued a Discussion Paper called “A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting.” The Paper sets out the principles underpinning the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). It provides stakeholders with an opportunity to shape the future of financial reporting. The 239-page Discussion Paper, providing 26 questions for respondents to consider, is available for public comment until January 14, 2014.

In 2011, the IASB carried out a public consultation on its agenda. Most respondents to that consultation identified the Conceptual Framework as a priority project for the IASB. Consequently, the IASB decided to restart its Conceptual Framework project, which had been suspended in 2010.

This Discussion Paper is the first step towards issuing a revised Conceptual Framework. It is designed to obtain initial views and comments on a number of matters, and focuses on areas that have caused the IASB problems in practice. Consequently, this Discussion Paper does not cover all the issues that the IASB would expect to cover in an Exposure Draft of the Conceptual Framework. The Discussion Paper sets out the IASB’s preliminary views on some of the topics discussed. However, the IASB has not reached preliminary views on all of the issues discussed in this Discussion Paper.

The Discussion Paper addresses the definitions of assets and liabilities, recognition and de-recognition, the distinction between equity and liabilities, measurement, presentation and disclosure, and other comprehensive income. For an overview, see the July 23, 2013 article “IASB seeks feedback on conceptual framework revision” in the Journal of Accountancy online.