Wednesday, January 28, 2015

Professional Judgment Resources for Auditors and Audit Firms


The 1995 research report Professional Judgment and the Auditor was prepared by staff of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA), Research Studies Department (J. Paul-Emile Roy, CA) under the direction of an 8-member Study Group of professionals.  That Report identified many sources of information regarding the issues surrounding professional judgment. It developed a framework for professional judgment and discussed key factors that influence the judgment process. Furthermore, it provided valuable guidance to practitioners regarding their professional obligations when exercising professional judgment.

As noted in the previous post “A Process for Professional Judgment,” the US Center for Audit Quality (CAQ) has also recently published a Professional Judgment Resource. This Professional Judgment Resource is designed to provide auditors with an example of a decision-making process to facilitate important auditing and accounting judgments in a professionally skeptical manner. This CAQ Resource is aimed at both auditors and audit firms to enhance their system of quality control. According to the Overview (on page 2): “...the exercise of professional judgment should be: (1) Based on the relevant facts and circumstances known and available at the time the judgment is made; (2) Made after the consideration of reasonable alternatives; (3) Sensitive to the degree of uncertainty that may be inherent in the judgment; and (4) In compliance with the applicable professional standards.

 Effective auditor decision making also requires the application of professional skepticism. Indeed, the appropriate exercise of professional skepticism throughout the judgment process is at the heart of effective auditor decision making. Accordingly, the CAQ Resource outlines a decision-making process grounded in five essential actions that include identifying and defining the issue, reviewing and completing the documentation, and explaining the rationale for the conclusion. In addition, the Resource identifies several of the more common judgment tendencies and traps that can potentially lead to bias and weaken professional skepticism. It also provides illustrative examples of these tendencies and strategies that can be used to avoid them.