Monday, September 19, 2016

Supporting Credibility and Trust in Emerging Forms of External Reporting

The Integrated Reporting Working Group of the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) has released a Discussion Paper, Supporting Credibility and Trust in Emerging Forms of External Reporting: Ten Key Challenges for Assurance Engagements. It is intended to facilitate an open discussion about the IAASB’s potential role regarding emerging forms of external reporting, which are referred to as “EER”, and where others can or need to play a role in a holistic and interactive process to support credibility and trust in these reports. A Frequently Asked Questions page and a document called At a Glance have been created as additional resources. Comments on the Discussion Paper are requested by December 15, 2016.


It is noteworthy that Challenge 8 of this Discussion Paper deals with Exercising Professional Skepticism and Professional Judgment. It notes that, “There may be more areas that require judgment in applying EER frameworks than in applying financial reporting frameworks and more areas where the judgments in preparing the subject matter information are susceptible to subjectivity and management bias. There are therefore generally more areas where there is a need to apply professional judgment and professional skepticism in EER assurance engagements. At the same time, given the broader and more diverse subject matters addressed, it may be more challenging for the practitioner to obtain the competence needed to support the application of professional judgment and professional skepticism in relation to such engagements.”

Furthermore, “Professional judgment and professional skepticism are interrelated and play a fundamental role in assurance engagements. The IAASB, in conjunction with the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) and the International Accounting Education Standards Board (IAESB), is currently exploring how best to emphasize the importance of exercising professional skepticism within a financial statement audit, including whether changes are needed to the ISAs or whether other action may be necessary.”