The authors solicit the opinions
of academic accountants about how likely they are to go along with the
conditions. They link these activities to the following ethical issues:
fair-mindedness, objectivity and integrity. They conclude that the more
experienced accounting academics (i.e., full professors, current chairs,
holders of endowed chairs and designated faculty fellows) are less likely to
engage in ethically questionable relationships with external sponsors than
academics who are less experienced.
The results are driven primarily
by two cases: allowing a Big Four CPA firm to interview students before other
firms as a condition of continued recruiting and allowing a firm to decide on
the recipient of a named faculty fellowship. Read more in the forthcoming
research article “Ethics
of Relationships between Accounting Academics and External Sponsors,” by Steven
M. Mintz, Li Dang and Arline Savage in Issues in Accounting Education (2013)
published by the American Accounting Association.